On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:54:27AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > I have to say I've very -1 on anything that uses XML as a source > format for human written content. It is massively hostile to > authoring by hand. Yes. > Prehistoric it is not. Old yes, showing its age yes. But prehistoric > is flat out incorrect. The nice thing is I have a shellscript from the '80s when I was at BTL Naperville (and rather a 'ROFF nerd) that still works nicely to generate a man file. It works, and has outlived other doc formats that have not caught on (such as info). Cheers, -- Dave Ihnat _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx