Greshko wrote: >> I think I found the problem. Comparing packages installed on this >> problem machine with others, I noticed that grubby was not >> installed. After installing it and then re-installing the kernel, >> I find the kernel in /boot where it belongs. >> >> Evidently, something isn't checking dependencies sufficiently. I >> saw no error messages indicating anything was missing. > If that turns out to be the case, and if things on that machine used > to work, it would be interesting to know if/when grubby was removed. Too long ago to still be in my /var/log/dnf* logs. Evidently, some time after kernel 4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64 as that was the last one properly placed in /boot. > Also, if it fails with grubby out it sounds like a very good > bugzilla. True. -- Dave Close _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
