Re: dnf Upgrade Produces GPG Error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/17/18 18:26, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Package flash-plugin-29.0.0.113-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
> Error: GPG check FAILED 


Oh, I see I mis-read the error message.  The package isn't signed.

My flash-plugin package is

flash-plugin-29.0.0.113-release.x86_64

while you're trying to install

flash-plugin-29.0.0.113-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm

Where did you get that package?  It seems not from the Adobe repo.

-- 
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux