Hello. SecureBoot should not be a problem, because the Bootloader on Fedora is signed. I have Secureboot enabled on my machine, which is a HP (Compaq) Notebook and everything runs fine. Regards, Dirk Am Sonntag, den 25.02.2018, 11:22 -0700 schrieb stan: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 12:15:05 -0500 > Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I ordered another Asrock motherboard to replace the one I haven;t > > been able to install Fedora 27 on. The user manual says it can be > > setup to boot uefi or legacy bios by enabling csm. I do not need to > > dual boot with Windows, only Fedora 27 so it appears to me that the > > legacy option is best in my case. > > > > Is that rightor am I missing something? > > My understanding is that secure boot is to protect from unauthorized > access to the machine, and prevent unauthorized software from running > on the machine. Important for things like laptops that are liable to > be stolen, but less necessary for home desktop computers. > > That is, I agree with you. But I look forward to seeing the > reasoning > of people who disagree. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Dirk Gottschalk Paulusstrasse 6-8 52064 Aachen Tel.: +49 1573 1152350
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
