Re: off topic -- vm issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12Feb2018 21:08, bruce <badouglas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I'm testing digital ocean creating droplets/snapshots/etc..
>>
>> I've create droplets, and from them - snapshots which have allowed me
>> to regenerate additional droplets. Droplets are VM/copies of servers..
>> Snapshots are compressed images.
>>
>> Recently, I decided to try to "replicate" a droplet of size X to a
>> smaller size. For the most part, the process works. I have a smaller
>> working droplet that I can ping/ssh into.
>>
>> The issue I'm now facing, is that generating a snapshot, followed by
>> regenerating a new droplet, seems to fail.
>>
>> The resulting new droplet has an IP, but pinging/ssh'ing into it
>> fails/hangs.
>>
>> I'm posting to see if anyone has any clue as to what might be
>> happening. I suspect that in my rsync process xfering files from the
>> initial droplet to the new droplet (used for the snapshot) that I may
>> have screwed up some files that are used for the snapshot to droplet
>> process.
>
>
> Just wondering: if you're making droplets from snapshots, why do you need to
> rsync any files? You're effectively cloning the previous droplet, so all the
> files should already be there.
>

Hey Cameron.

DO permits creating droplets of different configurations (cpu/mem/drive)

In my case the initial droplet (droplet1) has a larger hard drive (and
a higher cost)
I've got a bunch of stuff on it, but the drive is only about 20G

I've tested creating a smaller droplet (call it droplet2) by doing all
the rsync/copying to create essentially the same server as droplet1.

This works.. I can access it via ssh/ping with no issues.

My overall process requires me to run multiple copies of droplet2 in
parallel which can be accomplished by creating a snapshot of droplet2
and then spinning up multiple instances. I've done this 1000s of times
with basic droplets.. but never one where I've rsyn/copied data from
one server to another..

I'm thinking that I've screwed up some "dir/files" that are unique to
a droplet and used for the snapshot process.. I can't find any data on
how the "snapshot/vm" process really is implemented within
digitalocean. My last hope is to iteratively rsync, testing out the
snapshot/droplet process until i figure out the real issues..

thanks!


> Um, how are you defining "smaller"? Less memory? Less disc?
>
> A snapshot with less disc might have a corrupted filesystem if you cut off a
> portion of the disc with files in it.
>
> Cheers,
> Cameron Simpson <cs@xxxxxxxxxx> (formerly cs@xxxxxxxxxx)
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux