On Sun, 4 Feb 2018, jdow wrote: > On 20180204 06:57, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 02/04/18 22:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> i just did a quick test with abcde, ripping a CD to flac both with > >> and without the "-1" option (diff being ripping to a single FLAC file > >> versus individual FLAC files). the difference in final, total size is > >> negligible, both directories around 267M. > >> > >> is there any benefit to one strategy or the other? i assume that i > >> can rip a CD to a single FLAC file and, subsequently, break it into > >> pieces later when i decide how i want to organize CDs and individual > >> songs. > > > > > > I'd go with one file per track as opposed to one file per CD. > > > > The breaking into pieces later on seems like more work. Besides, > > on almost any CD there will be one or two tracks that aren't of > > interest even if the artist is a favorite. > > BoBW - one folder per CD and one file per track. that's what i'm getting with "abcde -o flac", so i'm just going to stick with that. rday _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx