Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/29/18 15:47, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 19/01/18 15:11, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system the time
>> taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1 MByte per second across
>> the network interface.
>>
>> If I copy a single large file I see a network data rate of about 110 MBytes/sec
>> which is about the limit of the Gigabit Ethernet interface I am using.
>>
>> Now, in the past I have used the NFS "async" mount option to help with write speed
>> (lots of small files in the case of an untar of a set of source files).
>>
>> However, this does not seem to speed this up in Fedora27 and also I don't see the
>> "async" option listed when I run the "mount" command. When I use the "sync" option
>> it does show up in the "mount" list.
>>
>> The question is, is the "async" option actually working with the NFS v4 in Fedora27 ?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Anyone using NFS these days ?

Yes, but only as a client at the moment.

>
> Server is a Fedora27 as well. vers=4.2 the default. Same issue at other sites with
> Fedora27.
>
> Server export: "/data *.kingnet(rw,async,fsid=17)"
>
> Client fstab: "king.kingnet:/data /data nfs async,nocto 0 0"
>
> Client mount: "king.kingnet:/data on /data type nfs4
> (rw,relatime,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,nocto,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=192.168.202.2,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.202.1)"
>
>
>

If I have time (my) tomorrow I'll have a look at testing it.  But, could you define
what you mean by "big source tar" and "single large file"? 

In particular the "tar" procedure.  I'm not sure if you have an nfs mounted file
system and you are creating a tar from data on that file system, which would need to
be read and then compressed locally and written back to the nfs mounted file system. 
So, I just want to get the data flow to match.

And what is the size of the single large file and are you doing a copy from a local
file system to the nfs partition?


-- 
A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux