On 01/14/18 23:11, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 08:57 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >>> I have a Samba server running on a NAS, but according to my Windows VM >>> it's running SMB1 and is thus insecure, so Windows won't connect to it. >>> >>> I've added the line "min protocol = SMB2" to the smb.conf file and >>> restarted the service, but Windows remains unconvinced. >>> >>> What else do I need to do? Is there an easy way to ping the server >>> (from Linux) and check what protocol it's using? Note that Linux has no >>> problem connecting to the server. >> An excellent question for a samba support forum (and mention what version of >> samba you're using). >> >> One option: >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > Sure. I recognise that this isn't a Fedora issue, however I've had some > luck with Samba questions here in the past so I thought I'd check first > in case it's something obvious. Not really interested in becoming a > Samba expert ... > > The Samba version is 3.2.15. > OK.... I found the way to list the versions being offered by a remote service. nmap -p445 --script smb-protocols <target system> Example, for my NAS.... [root@meimei ~]# nmap -p445 --script smb-protocols ds Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2018-01-14 23:14 CST Nmap scan report for ds (192.168.1.152) Host is up (0.00027s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 445/tcp open microsoft-ds MAC Address: 00:11:32:2A:64:E2 (Synology Incorporated) Host script results: | smb-protocols: | dialects: | 2.02 | 2.10 | 3.00 | 3.02 |_ 3.11 -- Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx