Resolve fc27.i686 vs. fc27.x86_64??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Probably in connection with some version of yumex, I have somehow 
gotten both */fc26.i686 and */fc26.x86_64 forms of a dozen or so rpms for 
compiz. 

	This has not been a problem till now. fc26 (and, unless I'm 
misremembering, fc25 and fc24 before that) has just ignored the 
superfluous ones. But now system-upgrade is choking on the ones for fc27.

	The machine is actually .x86_64, as I have now discovered. I 
tried adding --allowerasing and --allowerasing --best, but with no 
success.

	Do I dare do something like "dnf remove compiz"?? (Or perhaps 
"dnf remove */compiz/*/.i686 ???)



_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux