Re: repos for Fedora 26 i386 (Mate) network install?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/14/2017 07:37 PM, Franta Hanzlík wrote:
Hello Ralf and Jeff,
thank you for your answers. I finally found the repos descriptions here:

ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/fedora-secondary/releases/26/Everything/i386/os/Packages/f/fedora-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/local/fedora/26/i386/os/Packages/bellet-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/remi/fedora/26/remi/i386/remi-release-26-2.fc26.remi.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpmfusion/free/fedora/releases/26/Everything/i386/os/Packages/r/rpmfusion-free-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpmfusion/nonfree/fedora/releases/26/Everything/i386/os/Packages/r/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-26-1.noarch.rpm
ftp://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/planetccrma/26/i386/planetccrma-repo-1.1-3.fc26.ccrma.noarch.rpm

Or you could just go to the websites of each project where they provide the release rpms.

My troubles were especially with the determination of the places of the
Fedora repos itself - thanks to my error with the evaluation of the metalink
reference to the Fedora 26/i386 mirror list, and also because I did not find
mirrors on any server I used before. The explanation was simple - while
the metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-26&arch=x86_64
returns 77 sites of mirrors, the metalink for i386 return only 5 (!) sites
- that were not the ones I was looking for.

Why does that matter? dnf will use the metalink and find the mirrors that are available. What are you trying to do?

Reason why I'm using i386 arch - I have quite a number 8+ year old PCs,
that are quite sufficient for work and have only 0.5 - 2 GB of RAM.
(and although some of them should perhaps run on x86_64, I do not like
actual 32- and 64-bit SW mishmash on x86_64 (F26/x86_64 release has 19281
x86_64.rpm packages and 8200 .i[3456]86.rpm - 30%!). 10+ years ago I was
More than ten years ago I worked with Linux on DEC Alpha servers/ws, and
pure 64-bit wasn't problem - and now, 15 years later, we still sin for
the backward compatibility of x86_64 architecture. ;)

You can run pure 64-bit if you want. The 32-bit libraries are just available if necessary, for example wine or various third-party applications.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux