Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/17 21:28, jeandet wrote:
> Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 à 15:14 +0800, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 10/11/17 14:56, Jeandet Alexis wrote:
>>> In my lab we have a "funny" beaviour with nvidia akmods.
>>>
>>> - On my desktop I have a i7-6700K with an integrated GPU plus a GTX 1050 Ti ->
>>> kernel/akmod updates works great
>>> - On a second destop we have a i7-6950X without integrated GPU plus a GeForce GTX
>>> 1050 -> akmod always fail we have to relaunch it manually on each updates
>>> - On a third desktop we have a i7-7820X without integrated GPU plus a GeForce GTX
>>> 1050 -> akmod always fail we have to relaunch it manually on each updates
>>>
>>> I really looks like akmod fails if there is no aditionnal GPU. Does anyone see the
>>> same behaviour?
>>>
>>
>> Not seeing any problems here.
>>
>> What does "fail" mean?  There are logs in /var/cache/akmods and you may want to give
>> more info.
> in /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log for one update:
>
> 2017/09/11 10:40:50 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64
> 2017/09/11 10:40:50 akmods: Building and installing nvidia-kmod
> 2017/09/11 10:40:50 akmods: Building RPM using the command '/sbin/akmodsbuild
> --target x86_64 --kernels 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64 /usr/src/akmods/nvidia-kmod.latest'
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: Installing newly built rpms
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: DNF detected
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: Could not install newly built RPMs. You can find them
> and the logfile
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: 375.66-3-for-4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64.failed.log in
> /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.11.8-200.fc25.x86_64
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: Ignoring nvidia-kmod as it failed earlier
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: Hint: Some kmods were ignored or failed to build or
> install.
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: You can try to rebuild and install them by by calling
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: '/usr/sbin/akmods --force' as root.
> 2017/09/11 10:45:01 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64
> 2017/09/11 10:45:01 akmods: Ignoring nvidia-kmod as it failed earlier
> 2017/09/11 10:45:01 akmods: Hint: Some kmods were ignored or failed to build or
> install.
> 2017/09/11 10:45:01 akmods: You can try to rebuild and install them by by calling
> 2017/09/11 10:45:01 akmods: '/usr/sbin/akmods --force' as root.
> 2017/09/11 10:53:46 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64
> 2017/09/11 10:53:46 akmods: Building and installing nvidia-kmod
> 2017/09/11 10:53:46 akmods: Building RPM using the command '/sbin/akmodsbuild
> --target x86_64 --kernels 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64 /usr/src/akmods/nvidia-kmod.latest'
> 2017/09/11 10:53:57 akmods: Installing newly built rpms
> 2017/09/11 10:53:57 akmods: DNF detected
> 2017/09/11 10:54:02 akmods: Successful.
> 2017/09/11 10:55:40 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64
> 2017/10/09 11:45:44 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64
>
> in /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/375.66-3-for-4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64.failed.log
>
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: DNF detected
> erreur : db5 erreur(-30969) de dbenv->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH: Database
> environment version mismatch
> erreur : impossible d'ouvrir l'index Packages en utilisant db5 -  (-30969)
> erreur : impossible d'ouvrir la base de données paquet dans /var/lib/rpm
> Erreur : Error: rpmdb open failed
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: Could not install newly built RPMs. You can find them
> and the logfile
> 2017/09/11 10:41:00 akmods: 375.66-3-for-4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64.failed.log in
> /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/
>
> It seems that akmods calls dnf while dnf is already doing something else. So it is
> less obvious why it doesn't(never) append on my machine.
> BTW in the past yum or dnf were just waiting for other process to finish and now it
> returns immediately most of the time, I don't know why.
>>
>> Of course akmods-nvidia comes from rpmfusion.  So, you may want to ask on their
>> mailing list?
> Yes, I just wanted to see if anybody else see the same behavior before feeling a BR.
> I might be wrong but I expect to see more people ont his ML.

Are you by any chance running the dnf plugin tracer?

This is known to interfere with the akmod process.


-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux