Re: ACPI errors revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/26/17 23:01, John Pilkington wrote:
> A few weeks ago I started seeing error lines on a black screen at the start of the
> f25 boot process, but only recently have I found them in dmesg and examined them.
>
> [    0.110117] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): \_SB.PCI0._OSC: Excess arguments - ASL
> declared 5, ACPI requires 4 (20170119/nsarguments-189)
>
> [    0.110213] ACPI Error: [CAPD] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS
> (20170119/dsfield-211)
>
> [    0.110262] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0._OSC] (Node
> ffff961f970b8820), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20170119/psparse-543)
>
> [    0.110320] acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC failed (AE_ALREADY_EXISTS); disabling ASPM
>
> [    0.110329] acpi PNP0A08:00: [Firmware Info]: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus
> 00-3f] only partially covers this bridge
>
> Their first appearance followed an MB battery change.  Nothing seemed broken, and I
> took little notice.   But now I see the date 20170119, which implies something in
> software.  google found
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/10/1232, 'PCI IRQ allocation broken' - with
> undesirable effects.
>
> That's linked to
>
> https://bugzillakernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195319
>
> which is marked as a duplicate of BZ 195311 and closed.

I don't believe the date you are seeing is indicative of anything being wrong.

As a matter of fact, if you do a google search on nsarguments-189 or dsfield-211
you'll come up with a large number of finds such as this one
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2199573  which has an entry dated January
17th, 2014 and a reference to 20131115/nsarguments-95.  So, I suspect the date in
these messages are pointing to the date the module's code was last modified.

>
> Perhaps coincidentally, one of my pci devices (onboard audio) unexpectedly got
> disabled when I changed a video card. Details on the rpmfusion list. The audio is
> working again after a BIOS edit, but I'm still seeing the errors above in dmesg. 
> The BIOS manual suggests that ACPI will override the BIOS setting.  I'm confused.
>
> John P
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux