Re: Private DNS

["Walter H." <Walter.H@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06.06.2017 21:47, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> > On 06.06.2017 20:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
> > > > So .lan. can't be used.
> > > It can be used, just be aware that maybe someday in the future it 
> > will have a different meaning.
> >
> > you're kidding;
> > as it seems there is no defined TLD for exact this use ...
> I'm not kidding.  Why is it a problem?
>
> > > Otherwise, just pick some random short selection of characters.  
> > It's really not that complicated.
> >
> > I replied to this mail with:
> >
> > if I interpret your reply correctly, I could also use just .waldi or 
> > .waldinet?
> >
> > and their reply was:
> >
> > If it's only for internal network, you can use .waldi or .waldinet.
> Exactly.  If you prefer that, then even better. 

today I found this:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/

as it seems, will .home declared as special domain for private use 
similar to RFC1918 IP addresses ...

I've the solution, or does anybody see a bug?

Thanks,
Walter

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx