repomd.xml cannot verified at repo openh264/F26

[Robert Lu <robberphex@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,all.

I meet this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445817

When I run dnf upgrade, it faild:

Cannot download 'https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/26/x86_64/': repomd.xml GPG signature verification error: Bad GPG signature.
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-cisco-openh264'

So, I tried to verify repomd.xml manually, the result is:

$gpg --list-keys
$gpg --import  /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64
gpg: key 64DAB85D: public key "Fedora 26 Primary (26) <fedora-26-primary@fedoraproject.org>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:               imported: 1  (RSA: 1)
$gpg --list-keys
/home/rlu/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
----------------------------
pub   4096R/64DAB85D 2016-09-09
uid                  Fedora 26 Primary (26) <fedora-26-primary@fedoraproject.org>

$gpg --verify repomd.xml.asc repomd.xml
gpg: Signature made Sat 25 Mar 2017 02:41:50 AM CST using RSA key ID 64DAB85D
gpg: Good signature from "Fedora 26 Primary (26) <fedora-26-primary@fedoraproject.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: E641 850B 77DF 4353 78D1  D7E2 812A 6B4B 64DA B85D

I think this is a success result.

But why dnf is failed?

--

Robert Lu <robberphex@xxxxxxxxx>
About me: http://about.me/RobberPhex

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx