On 04/12/17 04:48, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 04/11/2017 11:42 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 04/10/2017 11:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>>> You mean my ISP does not handle IPv6 correctly, right? >>>> For the short term, is there any harm to stick to IPv4? >>> In my opinion, it is not clear that it is your ISP as there are probably >>> many boxes between your system and the destination. Some owned by your >>> ISP, others not. >> >> >> It's true that there are intermediary routers, but is there really a >> useful distinction between an IPv6 problem in his ISP, and an IPv6 >> problem at his ISP's network provider? > Gotta go with Gordon here...to the end user, the problem is at the ISP. > Whether it's with the ISP itself or upstream of the ISP with one of its > providers is up to the ISP to chase down. Most decent ones will as it's > very likely that if it affects one of their customers, it'll affect a > lot of them. I just went through this as a peer of our ISP had a batch > of circular routes in their BGP tables which caused lots of connection > issues for us. Our ISP was clean, their peer was screwed up so they > worked with the peer to get it solved. I agree with what you and Gordon have said. My statement was just an overly pedantic (I think there may be a claim of redundancy to be made about that paring of words) observation about network topology. I didn't mean to imply that the ISP should not be contacted or be responsible to helping to track down the source of the problem. -- Fedora Users List - The place to go to get others to do the work for you _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
