> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:52 AM, <dsavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Would it be fair to characterize the state of F25 development for ARM as >> "experimental". >> > > Yes. Even the documentation says that the wifi doesn't work and the audio > doesn't work. It is obviously still a work in progress. I installed it > just > to prove I could, but if I want to use the Pi 3 for any real work, I'll > have to go back to F24 or use Raspbian. But I will be following the > development with interest, and I'll fire it up occasionally and apply > updates just to see the progress. (I really want to use the PI3 as a > MythTV > frontend, and I'd rather use Fedora because I am more familiar with it > than > Debian on which Raspbian is based). > > The difference as I understand it is with F25, they are actually using a > standard kernel. The F24 version (and, I think, Raspbian as well) use a > third-party kernel outside of the standard package repos. > > --Greg I was surprised to see very sparsely populated groups in yumex-dnf. While LibreOffice appears to be complete, KVM virtualization is almost non-existant. I supposed I should be searching for any official announcements regarding support for the ARM architecture in general and RP3 in particular. I suppose there are some applications and/or capabilities that can't be ported from Intel, at least not right away. It would be nice if Fedora could publish package lists that work today, those that "sorta" work, those that should work but don't right now, and finally, those that never will. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
