On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 00:04 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 02/08/2017 11:56 PM, Tim wrote: > > I wish that sort of useless description would result in packages getting > > an automatic banning. > > No, not banning. There should be guidelines for what an acceptable > description consists of, and any package that doesn't meet them should > be rejected until it does. I can't see the message this is in reply to. Was it perhaps cross- posted from somewhere else? poc _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
