On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:27:03 +0100 cen <imbacen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That is what worries me actually. Apparently libc++abi has to be > linked to libc++ but that is not the case with current package: > > ldd /usr/lib64/libc++.so > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe1c7d8000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f09d5072000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f09d4cac000) > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f09d49a3000) > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007f09d479b000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f09d4584000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000055b90043d000) > > > I am not a pro in C++, compilers and linkers so perhaps someone with > more knowledge can explain how this is supposed to work in the first > place. > > I also cannot find libc++abi or libcxx-abi in the repo unless it is > "cleverly" named as something else. > > Perhaps also relavant: > https://whatofhow.wordpress.com/2016/03/01/libclibcabi-on-linux/ I'm not highly knowledgeable of C++. But, a quick look around brings me to the conclusion that clang++ in Fedora is not complete. I couldn't find libcxxabi or libsupc either. We can hope that your person with more knowledge will appear. But it seems that libcxxabi is not in fedora, but requested, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332306 _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
