Build .rpm for X64_64 only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on 64 bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form:
myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm

Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains:
E: no-binary

Googling I found the package should be of the noarch architecture. Adding BuildArch: noarch right below Source in my .spec file leaves me with:
myapp-version.fc25.noarch.rpm and  fedpkg lint doesn't complain anymore.

My question: is this the correct way to build my .rpm, using the noarch in the spec file? Or shall I keep myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm and ignore the ling Error?

Thank you for help
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]
  Powered by Linux