On 11/28/2016 10:41 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 11/27/2016 08:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Might be worth getting the debugging info and reporting a bug
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting
Or not:
Note: these bugs will have default priority set to low as it's in 95%
not a DNF bug and wastes only time of DNF developers.
Why do you think that? This is definitely a dnf bug. But in this case,
there's no need to report it as it has already been fixed in a future
version.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/53ANQT6DNJD2XOVDHI67HTMDD3NMW54M/
"
afaik these are weak dependencies, that are not installed (by policy),
dnf 2.0 reports them without the confusing "conflicts"
"
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx