On 11/02/2016 06:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 11/03/16 08:59, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 11/02/2016 05:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:41:08AM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso [...] >>>> 14-Jun-2016 17:13 1G >>>> Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-24-1.2.iso [...] >>>> 14-Jun-2016 17:27 2G >>> I don't know the answer offhand, but do be aware that this looks more >>> dramatic than the actual difference, because of rounding to whole GB >>> values. The 64-bit iso is 1.47GiB while the 32-bit one is 1.60GiB — the >>> actual difference is 129MiB. It just happens to straddle 1.5 so looks >>> dramatic when rounded to whole numbers. >> Wow! I didn't realize it was that close. The two kernels and ramdisks >> could explain that easily. >> > > Yes, if you had both iso's you'd see.... > > -rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1676673024 Jun 15 01:27 > Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-24-1.2.iso > -rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1541406720 Jun 15 01:13 > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso > > A difference of 135,266,304. :-) I USED to have every ISO image ever made going back to FC1 (even some old Red Hat and Slackware stuff), but I started to prune the tree a couple of years ago. Now I only have the images I'll use (64-bit F18 through F24, both XFCE and server spins). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - Never eat anything larger than your head - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
