On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:01:06PM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > Not to my mind. SSO (single sign on) is, IMHO, a really bad thing. Yes, > it's easier to administer because the authentication is being handled by > someone else and you "don't have to be bothered". However, now your > security is now ENTIRELY dependent on the security of that provider. If > they're breached, YOU'RE breached. Relying on someone else to provide > your security is, again IMHO, a truly idiotic thing to do. Note that with the options provided, you could use your *own* open identity provider. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
