Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Joachim Backes wrote: >> >> > I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for >> > rpmfusion. >> >> What does "more actual" mean? >> Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL? > > well, I don't know what the OP means, exactly, but as of the last > time I looked, rpmfusion did NOT have an EL7 repository, so if this > UnitedRpms does, maybe it is "actual" instead of "virtual". Sorry, thought I was in the CentOS newsgroup ... I should have said, "Is it more likely to be compatible with Fedora". -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
