On 06/23/16 07:50, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 06/22/2016 04:27 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> > On 06/22/2016 04:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >> I thought the presets were only used on a install of a package. If >>> >> they are used on >>> >> upgrades/updates then wouldn't every update/upgrade result in services >>> >> being reset to >>> >> their preset? > IIRC, the presets are invoked by the post-install scriptlet in each RPM > via a "systemctl preset" command, so it'd be invoked many times. > That's fine. But I don't know what is being concluded. I don't think you saying that you'd consider it normal that an upgrade of a package reverts the service status to the "vendor presets"? Meaning, if a service's vendor present is "disabled" and I've specifically "enabled" it should not be OK that my choice is being overridden after an update/upgrade regardless of what is in the preset file. It would seem like an awful mess to me and I've never had to do any "cleanup" of this sort after updates/upgrades. -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
