On 06/21/2016 09:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/16 11:59, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I'll admit that the risk is hypothetical, but what does rpmfusion's flux
have to do with the risk of allowing unsigned packages?
It was only one package that was unsigned, and it came from rpmfusion, and they are in the
middle of putting up an new infrastructure. So not unthinkable a package had slipped thru
unsigned.
dnf stops at the first unsigned package. All the rpmfusion F24 packages
are currently in the updates-testing repository and are unsigned.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
