On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 18:37 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 10:25 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > > > > > > > > Now if only there was some way the system could have told me > > > that, > > say > > > > > > an error log where useful messages would appear rather than a lot > > of > > > > > > cryptic text that boils down to "something failed" ... > > Geeze! We should have noticed that it was "hibernation". Yeah, > > that > > writes the entire RAM out to swap. Insufficient swap will sure > > cause > > hibernation to not work. > It doesn't write the entire RAM, just what's in use, but I get it. > > However I added a large swap file to bring the total up to 16GB and > it > *still* fails in the same way. And no, I'm not using more than 16GB > of > virtual memory: > > $ free > total used free shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 16361232 9910132 645876 497680 5805224 > 5503832 > Swap: 16588792 3653100 12935692 > > The plot thickens. It turns out that hibernation can't used multiple swap areas, so the only solution is to have a large enough swap partition to start with. poc -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
