On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/05/2016 02:14 PM, John J. McDonough wrote: >> >> I think somehow the path through the virbr to the host across the >> network to the server the port is getting masqueraded. Even tried >> specifying the port but it came back different on the server. (although >> it looks like the port option doesn't work for NFS3+) > > By default, virbr is NATed, so it's quite likely thta the source port will > change when passing through that interface. Oops. I forgot about that in my earlier email because I don't use the default NATed setup so my route-setting advice wouldn't work. Sorry. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
