On 20 March 2016 at 16:08, jd1008 <jd1008@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/19/2016 08:37 PM, g wrote:
Well, I am mostly concerned with finding out the why of it.
On 03/19/16 20:52, g wrote:
On 03/19/16 20:38, jd1008 wrote:--
<>
SO how can I debug this, or is this the normal behavior?--
If normal, since which release?
because you booted to level 1, not all that is needed for xwindows
has been loaded.
if you init 3, note list of additional progs that are initialize.
after your login, run startx or init 5, depending on which state
you want.
and i just might be incorrect on that recall from 'chemo brain' memory
because i did a quick run thru and did not have problem issuing 'init 5'
or 'startx' as root user at level 1.
as for diff of what is initialized from 'level 1' and 'level 3', it
just may be appear that they appear diff.
my bad. please excuse.
What is NOT BEING DONE or STARTED which prevents going to full init level 5?
So init 1 is synonymous with the rescue target in systemd terms (see man systemd.special)
If you look at what is available at that level it does not surprise me that startx doesn't work.
Carrying out init 5 is synonymous with systemctl isolate graphical.target (the old runlevel 5 translating to the graphical target in systemd terms)
Related to this the old init 3 is roughly equivalent to systemctl isolate multi-user.target
I say roughly equal as targets and isolate is far more precise, powerful and capable than the old init levels and the symlinks that run to Kill or Start services so behaviour from days of yore may differ slightly ...
It would be useful if you are seeing issues transitioning from one target to another to get the journal from the attempts to do so.
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
