Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If I had known that, I might not have chosen btrfs for my filesystems. >> Came as a rude surprise when I suddenly needed more swap space, and >> couldn't do it. > > You might check the FAQ and also the Gotchas list to make sure you're > not missing something else. > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Gotchas > ... Some years ago Fedora promoted btrfs as the next great FS, to replace all others. I never saw this problem mentioned - somewhere there should be a warning that if you choose btrfs for all your large FS you might want a larger partition set aside for swap. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
