On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:54:33 -0600 (CST) vendor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, stan wrote: > > > > > If you don't go with PrivacyBadger, Ghostery is also a good way to > > block third party tracking sites, though it uses a look up list > > rather than real time determination. > > > > HTH > > > > This is a little off-topic for fedora, but since you mentioned it I > have to ask. I use Ghostery a lot. Is PrivacyBadger compatible with > it, or is it a one-or-the-other-but-not-both kind of thing? They'll run at the same time (I've done it). But, I think that ghostery will prevent privacybadger from learning, since it will block the sites on its list, so privacybadger won't ever see them to determine their behavior, and decide whether to block them. Sites that ghostery doesn't block will be monitored by privacybadger, though, so it could be considered a belt and suspenders arrangement. But, if it has never been trained by raw exposure, privacybadger shouldn't be run without the accompanying add-ons of its training. e.g. if it has always been run with ghostery present, don't put it on a system without ghostery also present (unless you want to retrain it). -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
