I'm working with a new PXE configuration file which may certainly contain some errors. Usually, it terminates with a "pane dead". But after the latest modification, it terminated by going to the Dracut emergency shell. In itself, that might help me, even though thus far I haven't found my error in the logs. But I did find something that seems quite strange to me and would like any available feedback. Inside the Dracut shell, I ran the journalctl command. As this was a server in a remote data center, I couldn't easily attach a thumb drive and save the result. But here are the last few lines output. Jan 19 20:35:52 localhost dracut-initqueue[812]: Starting dhcp for interface eth0 Jan 19 20:35:52 localhost dracut-initqueue[812]: dhcp: PREINIT eth0 up Jan 19 20:35:52 localhost dhclient[1041]: Created duid \000\001\000\001\03612\250\260\203\376\341\211. Jan 19 20:35:52 localhost dhclient[1041]: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 (xid=0x45a50c20) Jan 19 20:36:00 localhost dhclient[1041]: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 18 (xid=0x45a50c20) Jan 19 20:36:18 localhost dhclient[1041]: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 (xid=0x45a50c20) Jan 19 20:36:26 localhost dhclient[1041]: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 15 (xid=0x45a50c20) Jan 19 20:36:41 localhost dhclient[1041]: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12 (xid=0x45a50c20) Jan 19 20:36:53 localhost dhclient[1041]: No DHCPOFFERS received. Jan 19 20:36:53 localhost cracut-initqueue[812]: dhcp failed Jan 19 20:36:59 localhost kernel: random: nonblocking pool is initialized Jan 19 20:40:01 localhost dracut-initqueue[812]: Warning: Could not boot. Jan 19 20:40:01 localhost systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+20 from PID 823 (plymouthd). Jan 19 20:40:01 localhost dracut-initqueue[812]: Warning: /dev/root does not exi st Jan 19 20:40:01 localhost systemd[1]: Starting Dracut Emergency Shell... Ok, so the PXE startup doesn't think it was able to get an IP address. But when I look at the DHCP server, it did get an address! The times from journalctl are UTC and those from the DHCP log are local PST (-0800) but the times otherwise match up quite well. Here's what the DHCP log shows. Jan 19 12:34:52 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPDISCOVER from b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1 Jan 19 12:34:53 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPOFFER on 10.76.148.243 to b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1 Jan 19 12:34:57 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPREQUEST for 10.76.148.243 (10.76.140.72) from b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1 Jan 19 12:34:57 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPACK on 10.76.148.243 to b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1 Jan 19 12:36:01 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPDISCOVER from b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1: network 10.76.148.0/23: no free leases Jan 19 12:36:18 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPDISCOVER from b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1: network 10.76.148.0/23: no free leases Jan 19 12:36:26 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPDISCOVER from b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1: network 10.76.148.0/23: no free leases Jan 19 12:36:42 us02linuxdhcp01p dhcpd[8500]: DHCPDISCOVER from b0:83:fe:e1:cc:89 via 10.76.148.1: network 10.76.148.0/23: no free leases Not only was an OFFER sent in response to the first REQUEST, it appears that the OFFER was accepted by the client. Still the client sent four additional REQUESTs and didn't record the result of the acceptance. How can this be? -- Dave Close -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
