On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:29 PM, maderios <maderios@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/25/2015 10:00 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:50 PM, maderios <maderios@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> 'Secure boot' is just a windows problem. In Linux world, nobody uses >>>> 'Secure >>>> Boot'. In Windows world, they need it and they use it because Windows >>>> system >>>> is 'natively' insecured. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nonsense. Secure Boot secures Linux systems against rootkits, as >>> well, by prohibiting unsigned content >> >> >> Its' Redhat point of view... >> I'm not specialist but, historically, I know Redhat dev asked Linus >> Torvalds patch kernel with 'secure boot' >> Linus Torvalds answer (2013): > > You need to read the whole thread. It wasn't about just secure boot > yes or no in general. It had to do with enabling the use of keys in > PEs instead of only depending on X509 support in the kernel: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1445369/focus=1445405 > > and > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1445369/focus=1445405 > > Are good summaries. Oops. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1445516 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1447326 and -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
