On 12/18/2015 12:06 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Rick Stevens <ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-23-x86_64 which is a symlink to: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-23-primary I have run into the situation where this symlink still points to the wrong place, which would cause any of the RPMs to fail the check. Look to see if the symlink is actually pointing where it should. I've also seen it try to use /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-x86_64, so check to see that this one points to the correct Fedora version's key. There are clearly some bugs in dnf system-upgrade where setting up the GPG keys isn't done correctly.
That's an issue, but what was scary to me was that the RPM was referencing a file or symlink that did NOT have the Fedora version in it--just "fedora-x86_64" rather than "fedora-23-x86_64". Something like a kernel that doesn't specify the version is a BAD thing (IMHO). In other words, I don't think this is a dnf issue, but rather an RPM packaging error (at least in these two cases). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - 500: Internal Fortune Cookie Error - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
