On 12/17/15 14:58, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > On 17 Dec 2015 at 14:18, Ed Greshko wrote: > > From: Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: unetbootin > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date sent: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:18:48 +0800 > Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users > <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> On 12/17/15 06:34, Patrick Dupre wrote: >>> Unetbootin fails on fedora 22 >> Works just fine here on F22 under both KDE and GNOME. If started as a normal user you >> will get a prompt for the root PW. >> > Just tried it again on my Fedora 22 machine and it asks for the root > password, but then comes up with a screen that has UNetbootin at the top > center with a little Icon on the left, but then nothing but a blank gray area. > > Using a script with > QT_X11_NO_MITSHM=1 unetbootin > > Asks for the password, but then has the same title, but the windows has all > the correct info on the gray background. So, not sure what the difference is?? Curious.... FWIW these are the only QT related entries in my running KDE environment. QTDIR=/usr/lib64/qt-3.3 QTINC=/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM_CHECKED=1 PATH=/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/egreshko/bin QT_IM_MODULE=ibus QTLIB=/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib Ran unetbootin in both a VM and normal HW with an nVidia card and the nVidia drivers from rpmfusion. For completeness I just ran it on an F23 laptop also with nVidia with no problems. -- In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay away from computers altogether. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
