On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's a terrible name for anyone who knows motor racing: it indicates
a total failure.
What is wrong with the Linux world that prevents it from using human readable package names that indicate its FUNCTION?
Fedora-package-manager was not cool? Too obscure?
It can then provide a "fpm" alias via the alias shell function, that calls the longname version. What would be wrong with that?
And for compatibility reasons, aliases could be provided to the olver package names (provided the basic syntax is unchanged wrt command line parameters).
Is there any conscious effor to prevent modern Linux from using Human Readable Package Names? -lets call such effort *HuRePaN*
;)
FC
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario
- George Orwell
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario
- George Orwell
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
