On 12/07/2015 09:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
I have this error:
# dnf install MyPackage.rpm
Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
What's the output of "dnf install -b -v …" for that?
-----------------------------------------------
# dnf install -b -v rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
cachedir: /var/cache/dnf
Loaded plugins: reposync, needs-restarting, system-upgrade,
playground, download, noroot, Query, protected_packages,
debuginfo-install, generate_completion_cache, builddep, copr,
config-manager
DNF version: 1.1.4
repo: using cache for: fedora
not found deltainfo for: Fedora 23 - x86_64
not found updateinfo for: Fedora 23 - x86_64
repo: using cache for: updates
repo: using cache for: home_jeroenooms_opencpu-1.5
not found deltainfo for: OpenCPU 1.5 (Fedora_22)
not found updateinfo for: OpenCPU 1.5 (Fedora_22)
repo: using cache for: trillian
not found deltainfo for: Trillian
not found updateinfo for: Trillian
fedora: using metadata from Sat Oct 31 18:34:41 2015.
updates: using metadata from Sun Dec 6 19:45:27 2015.
home_jeroenooms_opencpu-1.5: using metadata from Wed Jul 1 14:22:10 2015.
trillian: using metadata from Fri Jan 9 17:17:59 2015.
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:38:10 ago on Mon Dec 7
14:35:28 2015.
--> Starting dependency resolution
--> Finished dependency resolution
Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The error message reads a bit as if providers are found but are
not installable due to hidden errors.
The cited library is indeed already installed:
% ldconfig -p | grep libR.so
807: libR.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so
This shared lib is provided by a home made package,
R-intel-core-3.2.2. This package is similar to Fedora R-core-3.2.2,
but built witn Intel compiler and MKL.
--------------------------------------------------------------
% dnf provides /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so
This is the wrong command to run for examining dependencies. You need to
ask for the provider of 'libR.so()(64bit)' not the pathname of libR.so.
Show that your installed "R-intel-core" package is a provider of that:
rpm -q --whatprovides 'libR.so()(64bit)'
------------------------------------
% rpm -q --whatprovides 'libR.so()(64bit)'
no package provides libR.so()(64bit)
----------------------------------------------------
BINGO
So I guess the trick is to create a yum repo in /etc/yum.repos.d and
follow these instructions[1] ?
You should also make sure your "home-made" libR RPM pokes the
pkg-config system so the various build tools know about it. Obviously
you've installed it, but likely
pkg-config {--exists | --atleast-version=VERSION | --exact-
version=VERSION | --max-version=VERSION} libR.so
doesn't return any data, so it's assumed the library isn't there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- "Daddy, why doesn't this magnet pick up this floppy disk?" -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
