On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:47:04 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote: > Maybe we need a new "packagers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" for this sort of > thing. We don't need even more lists: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo There are too many already. There are too many with "no description available", too. This one is scary: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relicensing No description and only spam since Oct 2011. There is packaging@ list, but it's more about packaging techniques and packaging guidelines rather than the review process or its problems. There's some overlap with devel@ list, too. More lists usually means that subscribers, who could help, are harder to find, because they are not subscribed everywhere. There are enough off-topic threads on this list, so a bit more tolerance for this tiny thread would be appreciated. Afterall, it has been opened by a _user_, who is looking into becoming a packager. I know that there are users with the same interest, but they are just too shy to even try submitting a package for review. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
