On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 15:58 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 30.11.2015, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > > Seat belts are also useless for >99.9% of car passengers. :-) The > > little inconvenience is accepted because > > they may turn useful one day. > > LVM can not possibly be life-threatening, in opposite to a non-used > seatbelt, which is why your argument is bogus ;-) > > Automatically introducing complexity into 95% of the users systems > just because it could > be useful some day is, quite frankly, embarassing. It makes sense the > other way 'round: complexity adds to the diffculties when > having to handle data operations (backup, encryption, transfer, > recovery..) , which in turn makes data loss more likely. A possible compromise would be to install LVM for the server version of Fedora and not for the workstation version. Just a thought. poc -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
