Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 08:36 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 29.11.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the > > overhead of > > LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical > > use > > cases, LVM brings absolutely nothing value-added. > > I'd like to second that! > > Mentioned the same issue here on this list several months ago when > F22 came up.. It's an issue that raises its head sporadically and has done for several years. I'm also in the No camp and take care to disable LVM on any new install, but I can't see the situation changing unless or until something functionally equivalent comes along (BRTFS?). In the meantime, we sigh and move on.
No, the whole point is that "functionally equivalent" still doesn't bring anything value-added to the table.
Attachment:
pgpRLaaFyv20d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
