Re: Is this a flaw or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2015-10-18 21:44, jd1008 wrote:


On 10/18/2015 12:37 PM, fedora wrote:
Hi listers

I have a workstation with two disks:

[root@casablanca ~]# parted -l
Model: ATA WDC WD20EFRX-68E (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags: pmbr_boot

Number  Start   End     Size    File system  Name Flags
 1      20.5kB  262MB   262MB                BIOS boot partition
bios_grub
 2      262MB   21.7GB  21.5GB  ext4         Linux filesystem
 3      21.7GB  32.5GB  10.7GB  swsusp       Linux swap
 4      32.5GB  870GB   838GB   ext4         Linux filesystem
 5      870GB   900GB   30.0GB  ext4         Linux filesystem
 6      900GB   2000GB  1100GB  btrfs


Model: ATA WDC WD10EADS-00L (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:

Number  Start   End     Size    Type     File system     Flags
 1      1049kB  52.4GB  52.4GB  primary  xfs             boot
 2      52.4GB  61.1GB  8703MB  primary  linux-swap(v1)
 3      61.1GB  1000GB  939GB   primary  xfs


[root@casablanca ~]#

NOTE: the first disk has got a gpt partition table and a BIOS boot
partition, the second has got an msdos partition table.
Both disks have got fedora 22 installed. They can run independently
from one another.
----------

Just now, I did an update

dnf update
...
...
...

on both disks. I rebooted both disks.

The result on the first disk (with gpt partition table) is this:
[root@thunder ~]# uname -r
4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
[root@thunder ~]#

[root@thunder ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64            2.6.1-2.fc22  @System
kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.4-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
kernel-headers.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
kernel-modules-extra.x86_64             4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
kernel.x86_64                           4.1.6-200.fc22  @System
kernel.x86_64                           4.1.6-201.fc22  @System
kernel.x86_64                           4.1.8-200.fc22  @System
libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64      2.6.2-1.fc22  @System
[root@thunder ~]#


Apparently, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installed, but the
machine according to uname -r
booted from it?????

------

The result on the second disk (with msdos partition table) is this:

[root@casablanca ~]# uname -r
4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
[root@casablanca ~]#

[root@casablanca ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64            2.6.1-5.fc22 @updates
kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-core.x86_64                      4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-core.x86_64                                        @updates
kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-core.x86_64                4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64       4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64             4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-devel.x86_64                     4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-headers.x86_64                   4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-modules.x86_64                   4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel.x86_64                           4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel.x86_64                           4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel.x86_64                           4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64      2.6.2-4.fc22 @updates
[root@casablanca ~]#

Here, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22 is installed and the machine according
to uname -r booted from it.

---------

Does the BIOS boot partition  make the difference? Can anybody explain
this strange behaviour?

Thanks for your attention.

suomi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Does /usr/lib/modules contain the dir
4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64 ?

No, it did not. I had to create it after updating.

Does /boot/grub2/grub.cfg  have a menuentry like this one:
menuentry 'Fedora (4.1.10-200.fc22.x86_64) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class
fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_
id_option
'gnulinux-4.1.10-200.fc22.x86_64-advanced-3e3ce754-4cf3-4673-9449-a42929c3ed31'
{

Note that 3e3ce754-4cf3-4673-9449-a42929c3ed31 is my disk's uuid for the
root partition.


following are the menuentries of /boot/grub2/grub.cfg:

[root@thunder ~]# grep menuentry /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
if [ x"${feature_menuentry_id}" = xy ]; then
  menuentry_id_option="--id"
  menuentry_id_option=""
export menuentry_id_option
menuentry 'Fedora (4.1.6-201.fc22.x86_64) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64-advanced-b8e065e1-2507-4a33-8224-f31620ad29f7' { menuentry 'Fedora (4.1.6-201.fc22.x86_64+debug) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64-advanced-b8e065e1-2507-4a33-8224-f31620ad29f7' { menuentry 'Fedora (4.1.6-200.fc22.x86_64+debug) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64-advanced-b8e065e1-2507-4a33-8224-f31620ad29f7' { menuentry 'Fedora (4.1.6-200.fc22.x86_64) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64-advanced-b8e065e1-2507-4a33-8224-f31620ad29f7' { menuentry 'Fedora (4.1.4-200.fc22.x86_64+debug) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64-advanced-b8e065e1-2507-4a33-8224-f31620ad29f7' { menuentry 'Fedora (0-rescue-302578b1d7b84aebb486be014ce1be91) 22 (Twenty Two)' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --unrestricted $menuentry_id_option 'gnulinux-0-rescue-302578b1d7b84aebb486be014ce1be91-advanced-b8e065e1-2507-4a33-8224-f31620ad29f7' {
menuentry '3boot via chainloader from other disk' {
[root@thunder ~]#


Sorry for the late answer, but I was away all day.

Thank you very much for your interest.


suomi



--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux