On 10/08/2015 11:21 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Hacking routes as one of the other replies suggested will only solve half the problem. The packet gets flung in the right direction. The problem is that the return packet won't be accepted. In fact the arp reply won't even happen.
That's not quite correct. The problem is not that the packets wouldn't be accepted by your client, or that your client would not reply to ARP requests. The Buffalo device at 1.1.1.1 would accept packets from your client (unless rp_filter is enabled and it had no default route, but let's ignore that), but it would lack a route back to the client. The Buffalo device would never send an ARP request, nor would it send packets in return.
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
