On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 10:46 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/15/2015 06:44 PM, John Mellor wrote: > > I checked the dnf log and dnf is configured to select some > > indeterminate Fedora mirrors site. I'm willing to bet that the > > unselected mirrors are no more than a couple of hours out-of-date > > at > > worst, and there is actually a software error at work here. So, > > how to > > I preconfigure my system to get the two updaters to select the same > > repo? > > Pick a mirror for each of your enabled repositories, edit the files > under /etc/yum.repos.d, disable metalink and enable baseurl with your > preferred mirror. > > > P.S, just out of curiosity, why is the software updater not sharing > > the > > same dnf and yum metadata backend that clearly works better? > > It does use the same backend. It keeps a separate copy of the > metadata, > though. Never was sure why; I thought that's what packagekitd was > *for*. Interesting test. Forcing both to use the same repo results in the same data. The metadata separation problem seems to explain the observed issue nicely. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
