On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:25:48 -0400 (EDT), Honza Šilhan wrote: > The more I think about it DNF does it right. You should report it to Fedora infrastructure. > DNF shouldn't inspect all mirrors - you would waste too much resources then. We need > a better mechanism. Just 1 reference repomd metadata with the most up-to-date metadata > checksums (on one server only). Than we could detect the mirror DNF chose is outdated. > Stuff for everyone interested. The feedback in the ticket I've opened is not encouraging so far. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4866 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
