On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Could be this: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220950 > > However I don't see the same snapshot message in that bug, that you get. > No, it's different. This bug is as easy to reproduce: run Fedora 22 Live Mode on laptop or VM, it boots default into liveuser, try a `sudo dnf install 'Development Tools'` then kernel crash, from console I collected the dm-0 IO Errors. This is always reproducible that makes me think Fedora Live Mode is not usable at all, or maybe no users at all. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also, overlayfs is really recently added to the kernel. It's much much > newer than device mapper stuff. So I wouldn't call it immature. You > might be thinking of the thin provisioning snapshots which is much > newer, but still has been around longer than overlayfs. But I don't > think the live media is using thin snapshots (?) I think they're the > conventional (thick) type. The fact is with overlayfs (or aufs from 2014 Ubuntu release) Live Linux you can apt-get install whatever (write to /) as much data as possible; till it becomes full and returns -ENOSPACE (and continues usable if clean some data), on this Fedora Live OS with device-mapper and simple sudo dnf install a few packages crashes kernel. Which is more mature? Maybe this is not the right place to complain or file a bug, could you tell where is a better place to draw attention from developers behind Fedora Live? > > > Chris Murphy Thanks, -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
