On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:17:56 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:54:35PM +0000, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >> > I'm not talking about the desktop, choosing one or another is trivial. >> > I'm talking about install time. I installed F22 from the live iso >> > (the only available), and I had no choice of customizing what's being >> > installed. Maybe I missed something or maybe I chose the wrong install >> > source. >> >> The emphasis is on getting you to a basic running system quickly, with >> as few questions as possible. Once there, you have much more powerful >> options for adding software, and it's available whenever is convenient. >> Why duplicate this at install time? > > More to the point, I don't think the Live images ever offered a choice. > That's kind-of the idea about live images. When you install from them, > you get the exact same system that you would get if you were to boot > from it. I would try the netinstall image to get choices. > > I believe, there was some talk of having updated live images from time > to time during the lifetime of a Fedora release, to aid installing an > updated Fedora version easier. It was abandoned as it required more > effort than available. > > -- > Suvayu > > Open source is the future. It sets us free. I understand the parsimony of the live image, but why isn't there a full fledged workstation iso available anymore? Or is there and I just missed it? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
