-----Original Message----- From: users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Hennebry Sent: dinsdag 2 juni 2015 7:20 To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: RE: I'm shocked, shocked! On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, J.Witvliet@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom H > Sent: zondag 31 mei 2015 15:23 > To: Fedora Users > Subject: Re: I'm shocked, shocked! > > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> To see that the "predictable" network name for my one and only >> ethernet port has changed once again. >> On fedora 22 eno1 is what used to be em1. > > That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... That is not a good enough excuse. *By design*, Fedora is a high-turnover distribution. Changing a naming scheme that security software relies on is a big deal. I'd suggest two utilities. One would record the current names and their mac addresses in a plain text file. The other would take such a file and update a configuration file to associate the names and mac addresses. The format of the file should remain constant between releases. -----Original Message----- I wasn't looking for an excuse. And it is not only security related, but more general networking. At how many places do you have to specify the name of your network device, and perhaps have to differentiate... Not just iptables, but routing, bridging, monitoring, building virtualized clients, etc etc etc No progress without change, but changing device-names isn't a trivial thing. I could write scripts on a test-machine, not needing to know the hardware layout of any intended target machines. Now I do need to know, or need to script around it. That is still fun, but changing documentation for real-end-users aint. :-) Hw ______________________________________________________________________ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
