On 27/05/15 04:13, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 27. 5. 2015 at 03:56:11, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Do I need to do anything more with this Fedora 22 beta system?
# dnf update
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:18:24 ago on Wed May 27
03:30:41 2015.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
That seems to indicate not.
This indication might not be completely correct. Unfortunately dnf does not
report packages that can't be upgraded due to broken dependencies by default
(there is an RFE for that somewhere). You can try running dnf check-update to
verify there is really nothing to do and if there is, you can run run dnf with
--best to see what the problem is. In my case, upgrade of half of the system
to F21 was blocked by chromium-v8.
If you need any further assistance, let me know.
Thanks
Jan
.
Doing:
# dnf distro-sync as ED suggested resulted in:
Downgrade 27 Packages
Total download size: 15 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/27):
And:
[root@box10 bobg]# dnf check-update
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:48:44 ago on Wed May 27
03:30:41 2015.
It appears that was done when I booted the compute this morning. It
looks like I am good to go.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 FEDORA-22b/64bit LINUX XFCE
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
