On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:36:37 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:46:31AM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > I would suggest seeing if pdf-stapler works fine with pypdf 1.13, and > > > hopefully it does, and then following (or helping with, since it seems > > > stuck!) <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991102>, which > > > suggests that Fedora replace pyPdf with PyPDF2 completely. > > I can do this, since I appear to have successfully packaged PyPDF2. > > Should I add on to that bug effort? Or is there some other way? > > Add to the bug is probably best, since other interested people are > already there. What I do not quite understand is what is going on on that bug list. It appears to me that there is an active effort there in the form of a src.rpm and a spec file. Should I just add mine there in addition to this effort? Btw, it appears that pypdf is not maintained so PyPDF2 which incorporates pypdf and also fixes the bugs besides being actively maintained should be what we should replace with. In other words, pypdf should be replaced. (And I have verified that it works for both python3 as well as python2.) Ranjan ____________________________________________________________ FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
