Re: Biting the bullet?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-05-11 18:40, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/11/2015 12:45 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
Why not backup everything,
then completely ERASE the old installation, installing over it
the current version from SCRATCH, then configure it to work as you need?

Seriously. Wouldn't it be a much more reliable path, and consume much less
time in the end?
....

Well, for one thing, installing from scratch requires possibly a large
number of config files, which would require remembering which ones
they are, search for them in the backup and overwrite the newly installed config files, or worse: merge them into the new config files, or go through
a painful edit to see what setting from the old make sense in the new,
since not all settings in the old would make sense in the new.

I DO know and confirm that things are exactly like that, because,
as somebody else in this thread put it:

It's not the upgrading process that's the problem. It's that the newer
software tends to be broken in anything but the default configuration.

My point is simply that all this "remembering which old configuration files should be reused, or painfully edited to merge them into the new ones" etc..

still is, in many real world cases, much less painful, frustrating, time consuming...

than forcing an obsolete system to morph into something else, all by
yourself, with nobody, from mailing lists to online tutorials, able
to help you. You get MUCH, MUCH more help and answers to questions like:

1) "I just installed the CURRENT version of this software. It doesn't do X,
 how can I configure it for that task too?"

than to questions like

2) "I have this 5-year old sw, with a config file in a format long abandoned,
how do I make it run just as it is, but in a totally new environment?"

because, if nothing else, when you ask type-1 questions there are way more people online with the same questions, and the related answers, in the same
moment, than with type-2 questions.

That's why, in my experience, reinstalling from scratch, then "painfully editing" ends up being quicker, more reliable and MUCH less painful than upgrades. At
least with upgrades that are NOT to the immediately next version.

Marco
--
http://mfioretti.com
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux