On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 04:09:32PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:48:46PM -0700, stan wrote: > > Those were interesting reads. It seems the infrastructure is in place > > to deal with the problem of service failure, but operational inertia is > > slowing adoption. In other words, just a normal human system. :-) > > The one thing I didn't see addressed was the comment requesting some > > notification if a service became a chronic (ab)user of the restart > > feature, so remedial action could be taken or requested. > > Well, it's logged.... but, yeah. In general, we don't have a standard, > integrated monitoring/alerting service for Fedora, except for desktop > notifications, which aren't ideal for many cases. (Like, basically > anything but a single-user desktop.) Working on fixing this would be an > interesting project — maybe under Fedora Server... Well, system mail daemon did that job pretty well. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
